Talk:Lara Croft (reboot timeline)/@comment-4450274-20130307173143

This is an amusing site. The quotes allowed above obviously cherry-picked to support the per-determined opinion that the "new" Lara Croft is horrible and nothing like the "original". It's odd that this is considered non-canonical. A different timeline for a character, or a slight variation, is not generally considered to be non-canonical. Rather, non-canonical refers to that originating from those other than the developer/owner of a product. Going by the definition used here, most major video game icons, and almost all comic book icons, have a numerous different non-canonical versions running around.

That being said, it's not really an issue. Whoever is doing this will either accept that Lara Croft has been reborn, or they won't. In the latter case, sites like this will slowly fade into obscurity as others willing to accept change will overtake them. *shrug* It's all the same, ultimately.