User blog comment:Christijoy13/1996 Tomb Raider vs 2013 Tomb Raider/@comment-24.210.249.239-20130707223436

I hate this! You didn't mention anything about the difficulty, number of levels, soundtracks, storyline, or anything of relevance towards a comparison.

I was sickened when you listed Legend and Anniversary after III, as if Last Revelation and Chronicles didn't come before. You hardly seem like a loyal fan to the franchise. People liked these games because they were difficult and didn't walk you through. If you're not spending thirty minutes trying to figure out where the hell to go, you're not playing a Tomb Raider game.

This game should have been called something suggesting a prequel. I still hate the idea of remaking the entire series, the originals are the best of the first generation of Sony consoles. The PS3 and PS4 can NEVER have as many levels as the originals, and putting in a tutorial is a punch in the face to old fans.

If you were a true fan, you wouldn't care about graphics, backstory, or tutorial. As for me, I'm sticking with Eidos, even though they work for Square Enix now, it's the same.